I don't see tools like structured data helping to "drive attention" as much as "nudging the right content more squarely in the peripheral of those who actually need it" (and maybe even those who aren't yet aware they could benefit from it).
Imagine a hunter who goes out to kill an animal to provide meat for his family. The search engine of the past helps achieve that objective by placing the closest available animal within range. The hunter's family now has food, but as it turns out, that animal was the neighbor's beloved yellow lab. Oops.
An LLM-powered search engine equipped w/ the insight provided by structured data might've been able to categorically distinguish which animals to place within the crosshairs of the hunter, even if the hunter didn't explicitly say what type of an animal he was interested in hunting.
If that turns out to somewhat accurate, we should have a higher rate of the right person being paired the right content, which I'd certainly be interested in as a content creator.
Great call-out. I hadn’t really thought of that approach. It’s still syntactically grosser imo, but does mitigate a lot of the issues if you don’t wanna use destructuring assignment and still want identifier-less variables.
Alex MacArthur
22 total comments
8/22/2024, 11:36:39 PM
Maybe technically correct, but the language around it often uses that specific word. See MDN:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/with
in reply to vasya
7/10/2024, 12:21:17 AM
np
in reply to Bobby
6/5/2024, 1:53:10 AM
Glad it was helpful, Ivan 👍
in reply to Ivan
5/27/2024, 6:12:00 PM
Hope you feel better soon, Vincent!
in reply to Vincent
5/19/2024, 2:42:05 AM
Glad to hear it, Isaías!
in reply to Isaías
5/12/2024, 6:25:37 AM
I don't see tools like structured data helping to "drive attention" as much as "nudging the right content more squarely in the peripheral of those who actually need it" (and maybe even those who aren't yet aware they could benefit from it).
Imagine a hunter who goes out to kill an animal to provide meat for his family. The search engine of the past helps achieve that objective by placing the closest available animal within range. The hunter's family now has food, but as it turns out, that animal was the neighbor's beloved yellow lab. Oops.
An LLM-powered search engine equipped w/ the insight provided by structured data might've been able to categorically distinguish which animals to place within the crosshairs of the hunter, even if the hunter didn't explicitly say what type of an animal he was interested in hunting.
If that turns out to somewhat accurate, we should have a higher rate of the right person being paired the right content, which I'd certainly be interested in as a content creator.
in reply to Jason Jeong
5/7/2024, 4:59:55 PM
Happy to help, Mr. Nutz!
in reply to Deez Nuts
5/7/2024, 4:57:43 PM
Glad it was helpful!
in reply to Rane Bowen
3/14/2024, 10:56:33 PM
Thx, Jacob!
in reply to Jacob Chappell
12/31/2023, 2:12:05 PM
Great call-out. I hadn’t really thought of that approach. It’s still syntactically grosser imo, but does mitigate a lot of the issues if you don’t wanna use destructuring assignment and still want identifier-less variables.
in reply to Falco
page 1 of 3